header banner

Development & migration

alt=
By No Author
What is the extent to which we can rely on remittance to keep our economy afloat? Now is an opportune time for our government to ask itself this question considering what is happening in the Far East, a region where hundreds and thousands of Nepalis work as migrant laborers and remit valuable money back home. The devastating earthquake and tsunami in Japan, which too absorbs quite a few Nepali workers, also makes for a compelling case to analyze if we have stretched our dependence on remittance a wee bit too much.



Our government recently had to evacuate a lot of migrant workers from Libya, a country that was opened up as a labor destination last year, after rising pro-democracy protests there and ruthless crackdown by the Muhammar Gadaffi regime put their lives at risk. Meanwhile, the government is already gearing up to rescue workers from Bahrain if the unrest there turns more violent. Pulling back workers from these two Arab countries may not really create a gaping hole in our remittance figures but what if for one or the other reason we have to, say, withdraw our approximately 500,000 workers from Saudi Arabia or from Malaysia that provides employment to another 400,000 Nepalis?



How one sees migration really depends on which side of the fence one belongs to. Those against it argue that it fosters inequality, promotes meaningless consumption and leaves the migrant-sending countries without able-bodied young men and women, a pre-requisite to development. On the other hand, those who advocate for it opine that capital and knowledge transfer by migrants help in development take-off. There are no doubt merits in both the arguments. However, the issue here is not whether migration is good or bad; it is rather about whether or not we have struck the right balance.



Remittance through the formal channels presently is equivalent to about 23 percent of our Gross Domestic Product. If we add money remitted through the non-formal channels, we can well begin to understand how it has buoyed our economy in recent times. But since we do not have any control on the politics or policies of our labor-receiving countries, the threat of the economy going asunder will always loom over our heads like the sword of Damocles. Thankfully, things did not spiral out of control as a result of global recession though remittance flows slowed down. But who knows what is waiting round the corner. It is therefore high time to start working on creating a vibrant domestic economy. Politics has dominated the landscape of Nepal for too long. Let’s now give economics the rightful place it deserves in our national discourse.



Related story

EU, IOM Nepal to launch project on mainstreaming migration into...

Related Stories
SOCIETY

Nepal Labour Migration Report 2022 launched

IMG_2331_20221220082454.jpg
Editorial

Create infrastructure, livelihoods to stop rapid r...

Migration.01
SOCIETY

Minister Basnet calls for tackling issue of migrat...

Migration.01
SOCIETY

IOM, in cooperation with Tribhuvan University, to...

290030662_741331593679299_7227823299050549985_n_20220629164137.jpg
ECONOMY

Nepal launch of Global Migration Film Festival 202...

1_20211202155325.jpg