The Social Security Fund (SSF) has reached an important milestone. It has collected more than Rs 111 billion from nearly 2.95 million contributors enrolled through over 23,000 employers across the country. At the same time, the fund has already paid out Rs 20.45 billion in various claims, including medical treatment, health, and maternity benefits. With its asset base growing steadily, the SSF now plans to invest in large energy projects, including hydropower, transmission lines, solar energy, and other renewable ventures. This is a sensible direction. Long-term institutional funds are expected to seek investments that provide stable returns over many years, and energy projects fit that requirement. Nepal continues to face a huge financing gap in power generation, transmission, and distribution infrastructure. The SSF's plan to invest in projects above 20 MW, either through lending or consortium arrangements, could help address that gap while generating returns for contributors whose savings are entrusted to the fund. The SSF is not entering unfamiliar territory. Besides the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA), two other major public savings institutions—the Employee Provident Fund (EPF) and the Citizens Investment Trust (CIT)—have long contributed to the development of hydropower projects. Their involvement has reduced reliance on foreign capital and commercial borrowing.
Salary as well as pension for some ‘lucky’ ex-bureaucrats
Investments from these institutions have been instrumental in implementing many of Nepal's major hydropower projects. They have demonstrated that pension and retirement funds can be channelled into national development while also providing attractive returns to depositors. Energy remains one of Nepal's most profitable sectors. Electricity exports to India are increasing, while domestic consumption is also rising. New transmission infrastructure is being developed, and renewable energy is receiving stronger policy support. Together, these trends suggest that carefully targeted investments in the energy sector could generate a steady stream of income over the long run. For an institution such as the SSF, whose obligations extend decades into the future, matching long-term savings with long-term infrastructure assets is a logical approach. Still, enthusiasm should not replace caution. The money held by the SSF does not belong to government officials, fund managers, or project developers. It belongs to workers and employers who contribute every month with the expectation that their savings will remain safe and productive. That means stringent due diligence, independent risk assessments, and transparent governance must guide every investment decision.
The SSF can maximise benefits for contributors while safeguarding their interests by adhering to a few fundamental principles. Priority should be given only to projects with sound technical, financial, and environmental foundations. Investments must be insulated from political interference and pressure from vested interests. Information on investment performance, exposure, and returns should be disclosed regularly to the public. Diversification is equally important; the fund should avoid concentrating a large share of its resources in only a few projects. Strict compliance with laws, regulations, and internal risk-management standards must be non-negotiable. The rising financial strength of the SSF presents a significant opportunity. If energy infrastructure investments are carried out with prudence and discipline, they can support economic growth, strengthen national energy security, and generate sustainable returns for contributors. Such outcomes would benefit retirees and their families while contributing to the country's broader development goals. What SSF leaders should remember, however, is that the success of these investments will depend largely on the quality, transparency, and discipline of investment decisions—not on the size of the fund.
